0
FR

An international call to preserve the cultural heritage of our digital age

We, Ars Electronica, MIT Open Documentary LabCo-Creation Studio, and SAT, are among the first generation to have created a significant portion of our collective imagination in formats that disappear faster than human memory.

For over thirty years, artists, creators, researchers, and communities worldwide have been inventing new forms of expression based on digital technologies, creating interactive, immersive, generative, and connected works. These evolving works reflect our era, our dreams, our fears, and our relationship to the world.

Yet this heritage is now endangered.

Every day, works become unreadable, inaccessible. Software disappears. Platforms shut down and take our data with them. Operating systems become obsolete. Servers are unplugged. Files become corrupted, knowhow is lost.

Some works created merely twenty years ago are already more difficult to access than centuries-old manuscripts.

The preservation of our technological memory must now meet an additional imperative: ecological sobriety. At a time when the volume of data being created exceeds any capacity for preservation, appraisal is essential; not as resignation, but as discipline. At the same time, the climate crisis is weakening the physical and digital infrastructures that house our cultural memory, threatening this accumulated knowledge, these identities, and these creations.

The concentration of our digital memory under the control of a few private actors, without protocols guaranteeing data sovereignty, threatens to dispossess all our communities of their own memory. This dispossession risks excluding from world memory the cultural rights of all, and deepening existing inequalities between communities that have the means to preserve their memory and those who do not.

We are witnessing, in silence, the gradual erasure of an essential part of our cultural memory.
This disappearance is neither natural nor inevitable. It is the result of unregulated technological acceleration and a lack of sustained funding for public institutions. It stems from a lack of collective vision. We must work together to develop a more sustainable approach to these challenges.
We affirm today that digital works constitute a global cultural heritage. Anyone who wishes to preserve them must have the means to conserve them, document them, study them, restore them and pass them on to future generations, in respect of cultural diversity and the limits of our ecosystem.

Digital works hold the same standing as classical art, not a lesser one. This recognition can’t be assumed; it has to be won.

We call for immediate international mobilization and an initial gathering of signatories before 2028.

WE DEMAND

      • Sustained public funding dedicated to organizations (public, community-based and independent) that carry out the daily preservation of digital heritage.
      • The international harmonization of preservation exceptions, to guarantee every organization the right to copy, emulate and migrate digital works despite technical locks, regardless of the jurisdiction under which it operates.
      • The defense of our digital sovereignty against the control exercised by private platforms over infrastructures and data, in order to maintain public control over our collective memory.
      • The creation of a formal international network of collaboration among cultural institutions, universities, laboratories and governments to harmonize standards, share expertise, and pool preservation infrastructures, respecting the contexts and priorities of each territory.

THESE DEMANDS ARE NOT NEUTRAL : THEY PURSUE THREE AIMS.

      1. Digital autonomy : communities must retain control over their memory, which cannot be made dependent on platforms they cannot influence.
      2. Cultural rights : every community must have the means and autonomy to govern its own digital heritage.
      3. Digital sobriety : preservation must actively reduce the carbon and water footprint of archiving infrastructures.

Preserving a digital work is not merely saving a file.

It means preserving an experience

It means preserving an idea

It means preserving an artistic gesture embedded in a technological and human context

Because a digital work is not a fixed object : it is interactive, generative, evolving

To preserve is to maintain the conditions of its vitality

We believe that a culture which fails to preserve its digital memory accepts losing a part of its history.

We refuse this amnesia.

We believe that digital memory is living memory

The time to act is no longer tomorrow.

Some works have already disappeared.

Others are disappearing as you read these lines.

Every year that passes makes their preservation more difficult, more costly, and sometimes impossible.

We address this call to all those who create, preserve, teach, fund, legislate, and imagine.

We invite creators to document their processes, favor open formats, and define the conditions for preserving their works during their lifetime.

Join your voice to ours.

Because preserving digital heritage is not merely a technical responsibility.

It is a cultural duty.

It is an act of transmission.

It is a commitment to the future.

 

The digital memory of humanity deserves to be protected. Now.

Sign the manifesto

Be the first to add your voice.

Your email will not be displayed publicly.

Signing as / Je signe en tant que*
  • Artist / Artiste·s
  • Organization / Organisation
  • Other / Autre

Nom qui sera affiché sur la page. Si vous signez en tant qu'individu, merci de le préciser dans les commentaires | Will be displayed one the web page. If you wish to sign as an individual instead, please mention it in the comments.

Envoyer

Organizations

SATARS ELECTRONICAMIT Open Documentary LabMIT Co-creation Studio

Signatures

DOCAM. (2010). Documentation and conservation of the media arts heritage [Research alliance]. Daniel Langlois Foundation. https://www.docam.ca

Ippolito, J. (2008). Death by wall label. In J. Ippolito & B. H. Jones (Eds.), New media: Art techniques (pp. 48–62). Wayne State University Press.

MIT Open Documentary Lab & Phi Centre. (2017, May 5). Update or Die: Future proofing emerging digital documentary forms [Conference]. Phi Centre, Montréal, Canada. https://cmf-fmc.ca/fr/futur-et-medias/articles/not-so-auto-save/

Rhizome. (1999–present). ArtBase: Archive of born-digital art [Online collection]. New Museum. https://artbase.rhizome.org

UNESCO. (2003). Charter on the preservation of digital heritage. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/charter-preservation-digital-heritage

UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-protection-and-promotion-diverseness-cultural-expressions

Variable Media Network. (2004). The variable media questionnaire [Methodological tool]. Daniel Langlois Foundation & Guggenheim Museum. https://variablemediaquestionnaire.net